Posts Tagged ‘container shipping’

Diesel Prices Return to “Normal”, Prices at Nov. 2008 levels, $2.90/gallon, freight carriers, container shipping, container trucking

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

Diesel prices hit their highest point since November of 2008 last week, as the average price nationwide rose to $2.90/gallon. That’s mostly bad news for freight carriers, who have to try to pass those higher costs on to suppliers or see their profits diminish. It’s hard to tell what is “normal” in the fuel market given the volatile nature of fuel prices in the last two years, but things are returning to pre-financial-meltdown levels.

That increase is a measure of economic activity driving fuel prices higher; container shipping traffic is forecasted to grow during 2010. The added amount of container trucking will add to the demand for diesel as we go forward.

Trucking logistics firms will need to look at fuel-saving alternatives in this high-diesel-price environment. Intermodal transport becomes more of a factor, especially if the railroads in an area are electric; they will both be less affected by the increased price of diesel and used what gas they do use more efficiently. Since most ships run on diesel, moving things onto the seas isn’t a huge advantage, although shipping is more fuel-efficient, albeit slower.

If the increase in diesel is deemed to be normal and we’re going to be stuck with these prices, alternative fuels are going to get a big push. Biodiesel will get a long look as a fuel additive at $3/gallon levels, and electric trucks might get more of a push; range is a factor, but if you can make a Porsche muscle-car electric, you’ll have a shot at making a interstate transport truck electric as well.

Sources: http://www.truckinginfo.com/news/news-deta…_category_id=42
http://www.thetrucker.com/News/Stories/201…entinMarch.aspx

Somali Pirates Lose at Sea, Win in Court, Mothership Sunk, but Ransom OK in UK

Friday, April 2nd, 2010

The Somali pirates had a win and a loss in their ongoing pillaging of the bank accounts of freight carriers in the region.

The loss came at the hands of the Danish Navy’s Absalom, who sunk a pirate “mothership” on Sunday. The Absalom had run off a pirate crew from a vessel they had started to seize last month as well, so our Danish friends had a good month, making them the unlikely baddest dudes in the Horn of Africa; you don’t usually associate the Danes as a naval powerhouse. The ship named after King David’s rebel son is going against type and getting out the Suezmax-sized can of whuppin’ on these modern-day rebels,

However, the pirates won a victory in court in Britain, where their High Court of Justice ruled that paying ransom to captors is not against public policy. In the absence of a naval task force right on top of a captive ship, ransom is often the safest avenue to save the lives of the captured crew. While paying ransom will encourage more piracy in the future, the court reasoned that not paying ransoms will likely result in dead crews, sunken ships and cargoes on the black market for the ships currently under pirate custody.

That puts the task force that the Absalom is currently heading up in a tough spot; the pirates have been given access to British cash if they grab a UK-owned vessel. It will make protecting container shipping going through the Suez Canal and on past Somalia a bit more difficult.

Sources: http://www.cargobusinessnews.com/news/wednesday/news5.html
http://seafarerblog.com/2010/02/27/payment…lic-policy.html

Pacific Shippers Allowed to Talk Slow Steaming, TSA Gets Anti-Trust Waiver on Fuel, container shipping, freight carriers, container trucks

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

When I first heard of the Transpacific Stabilization Agreement, a group of 15 big container shipping companies who get together to talk about rate issues on shipping from Asia to North America, I thought that it should run afoul of anti-trust laws. However, the TSA has an anti-trust immunity to “meet and discuss issues relating to freight rates and surcharges.” Thus, these seaborne freight carriers can agree to impose “voluntary” surcharges and steer clear of the anti-trust authorities.

The Federal Maritime Commission has now expanded what the TSA can powwow about, including pollution and fuel consumption issues. The hot-button issue on the fuel front is slow-steaming, where ships go at about 18 knots rather than the normal 25, cutting fuel costs in half. Setting up these slow boats to (and from) China will require longer supply lines and increased transit times; it also will tend to lower freight rates, as customers will expect that some of that savings will be passed on to them.

Freight customers will need to budget more time to get goods to US markets; any changes in the speed of the supply chain will have a ripple effect on other freight carriers.
Domestic container trucks will be getting their goods a week or so later under slow steaming, so their schedules will have to be modified. There may well be a lull in the number of shipments as slow steaming starts to become the norm, as ships that would have been pulling into port in the old days are still out at sea.

Source: http://www.joc.com/maritime/fmc-clears-tra…alk-environment

China Joins Anti-Pirate Fleet off Somalia, Benign Use for Blue-Water Naval Power, container transport, ship freight

Monday, February 1st, 2010

China has long been a seagoing nation, as traders had been active developing markets in the Pacific and Indian Ocean areas for centuries. That tradition has continued into the present, as many of the large container transport lines are China-based.

That presence on the shipping lanes means that Chinese ships are now in the sights of Somali pirates along with the rest of the world’s fleet. In the past, the Chinese navy has been used to protect individual Chinese vessels, but China has now offered to become part of the Shared Awareness and Deconfliction group that has sent ships to the area to combat the pirates..

Geopolitical experts in the west have been nervous about China’s development of a “blue water” naval fleet that gives the Chinese navy the capability of going beyond its territorial waters; the fear was that China might use that against some of its neighbors like Japan and the Philippines down the line. This case shows that, as a maritime nation active in the world economy, China has a benign use for its blue-water fleet, protecting its merchant fleet as they ship freight around the world.

Given that 47 ships were hijacked in the waters off Somali last year, China is now becoming part of the mercantile nations of the world. A half-century after Mao would rail against capitalist running-dogs, China has joined the pack in protecting their blossoming merchant fleet; you could solve China’s energy problem by putting a transformer at Mao’s grave; the founder of the People’s Revolutionary Army is doing 10,000 revolutions per minute.

http://www.handyshippingguide.com/shipping…r-shipping_1223

New Freight Terminal With Old Roots, British rail freight, freight carrier, container transport, bulk trucking

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

Bulk trucking firms use to bring freight to the old coal loading facility in Rugby, England, today trains run in and out of the old coal yard delivering goods to supermarkets in Scotland. The old coal yard was transformed into a rail freight terminal that currently services one train per day, but plans are on the drafting board to increase the amount of trains running through the Rugby Terminal to as many as three trains per day. If designers are able to complete the job of increasing the capacity of this rail terminal to handle up to three trains per day the Rugby Terminal should be able to handle about 50,000 containers per day. No firm dates have been given for any additional transformation to the Rugby Terminal to help increase the capacity to about three trains per day.

All around the world humans are trying to find ways to make use of things that we would normally just throw away or tear down, rather than find away to recycle or reuse something that still has value and usefulness, as long as we use a little innovation and elbow grease. The transformation of the old rail yard in Rugby into a container transport terminal is one example of a new way of thinking in both the United Kingdom and the rail freight carrier industry as a whole. The freight industry of Britain deserves a pat on the back for making use of an asset that normally would have been ignored.

In the future we’ll be seeing a lot more use of assets that in better times might have been ignored or left to rot, such as the old coal yard in Rugby. In fact, expect to see assets in the United States that normally would have been forgotten, used in innovative ways such as this in the future.

http://en.shippingchina.com/sailingnews/in…l/id/15044.html

Shipping Rates From Asia to Go Up

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

I hadn’t heard of the Transpacific Stabilization Agreement before, but it is a coalition (I almost said cartel) of big shipping companies serving the Asia-to-North-America run; it sets recommended “voluntary, non-binding guidelines” for cargo rates going to the US from Asia. A Westbound Transpacific Stabilization Agreement covers traffic heading back to Asia from the US.

A quick look of the list of carriers is a who’s-who of international shipping. The one glaring omission is Maersk, but that will change on Christmas Eve, as they rejoin the grouping.

The group has recommended a $320 surcharge per twenty-foot unit equivalent and a $400 surcharge per forty-footer. These are to be added to existing contracts; a larger increase is in their guidelines is in effect for new contracts to be negotiated next year.

This seems a bit odd that contracts can be unilaterally changed mid-stream, and especially in concert with other shipping company. However, when the TSA makes up a near-monopoly of the shippers, the firms can act as a cartel; with low shipping rates, ships are being pulled off the market and finding alternative shipping could be difficult.

I’m wondering why this isn’t illegal under price-fixing laws. If all the airlines said they were going to “voluntarily” raise their rates $50 a flight and then all did just that, the FTC would be in court that afternoon. The international nature of these firms, none of which are US-based, might make this fall under international rather than US law.

This is not good news for domestic container shipping firms, for the cost of shipping going up will mean less shipping.